Group petitions FDA to ban some food colorings
June 6, 2008
A consumer advocacy group called on the Food and Drug Administration Tuesday to ban the use of eight artificial colorings in food because the additives may cause hyperactivity and behavior problems in some children.
Controlled studies conducted over three decades have shown that children’s behavior can be worsened by some artificial dyes, says the Center for Science in the Public Interest. The colorings the center seeks to ban are: Yellow 5, Red 40, Blue 1, Blue 2, Green 3, Orange B, Red 3, and Yellow 6. The group noted the British government is successfully pressuring food manufacturers to switch to safer colorings.
Over the years, the FDA has consistently disputed the center’s assertion. Read the rest of this entry »
How healthy are you really eating?
May 24, 2008
Read between the lines and you’ll discover that what you’re munching on may not be the best choice.
Low fat. Reduced calories. Vitamin enriched. Walk down any aisle of your grocery store and you’ll be bombarded with foods boasting of their benefits. Okay, so wheat bread is better for you than white bread, but is that loaf you have in your hands really the best choice? Sometimes you have to step back and see what you’re buying to really know if it’s healthy.
Here’s a grocery store list of products you should be careful of:
Multigrain Cereal or Bread
You may think that anything that’s labeled seven-grain or multigrain is the best choice. Studies have shown that whole grain eaters have lower rates of heart disease and strokes. Many foods that claim to be rich in whole grains actually aren’t because the fiber and nutrients are stripped away when grains are refined into flour. Make sure you’re getting whole grain by learning the lingo of food claims. Bread that’s 100 percent whole grain contains no refined flour while cereal that’s made with whole grain may have a little or a lot. Always check the ingredients panel. Whole grains should be the first or second ingredient listed. Plus, products that have at least 16 grams of whole grains per serving are stamping their packaging with the Whole Grains Council’s logo, making it easier for you to find whole grain products! Read the rest of this entry »
Fish: Fresh vs. farmed, what you need to know
May 20, 2008
Overview:
From both a nutritional and environmental impact perspective, farmed fish are far inferior to their wild counterparts:
- Despite being much fattier, farmed fish provide less usable beneficial omega 3 fats than wild fish.
- Due to the feedlot conditions of aquafarming, farm-raised fish are doused with antibiotics and exposed to more concentrated pesticides than their wild kin. Farmed salmon, in addition, are given a salmon-colored dye in their feed, without which, their flesh would be an unappetizing grey color.
- Aquafarming also raises a number of environmental concerns, the most important of which may be its negative impact on wild salmon. It has now been established that sea lice from farms kill up to 95% of juvenile wild salmon that migrate past them.
Poultry giant Tyson Foods has 10 days to dismantle a national multimillion dollar ad campaign centered on the claim that its chickens are raised without antibiotics, a federal appeals court in Richmond ruled last week.
Tyson will have to remove posters and brochures from 8,500 grocery stores nationwide.
“We’re disappointed the motion for a stay has been denied and are evaluating our legal options,” said Gary Mickelson, a spokesman for Tyson Foods. “We continue to believe we have acted responsibly in the way we have labeled and marketed our products and intend to stand our ground.”
The ruling is a setback for Tyson in its ongoing battle with two of its competitors Sanderson Farms, based in Laurel, Miss., and Perdue Farms, based in Salisbury, Md. The two companies jointly sought an injunction to stop Tyson’s ad campaign, arguing the “raised without antibiotics” claim misleads consumers by making it appear Tyson’s chicken is safer or more healthful. Read the rest of this entry »
Chew on this: Bread plus…
April 10, 2008
According to Felicity Lawrence, author of the book, Not On The Label, bread making changed in the Sixties when scientists discovered how to make a loaf quickly and bulk it up with water.
“Instead of allowing two to three days fermentation they found that air and water could be incorporated into dough if it was mixed at high speeds,” she says.
“Double the quantity of yeast was needed to make it rise, chemical oxidants were essential to get the gas in and hardened fat had to be added to provide structure. The process gave a much higher yield of bread from each sack of flour because the dough absorbed so much water.” The added fat, often in the form of unhealthy hydrogenated fat, helps today’s bread look firm and spongy. It is often included as a part of the ambiguous-sounding “flour treatment agent” usually found listed in the ingredients.
Know your labels: The law and food allergies
April 3, 2008
- Approximately 6.9 million Americans are allergic to seafood, and 3.3 million are allergic to peanuts or tree nuts .
- About 3.1 million children in the U.S. have food allergies. - According to studies conducted by the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network (FAAN), peanut allergies doubled in children between 1997 and 2002.
- In the U.S., food is the leading cause of anaphylaxis outside the hospital setting.
- There is presently no known cure for food allergies.
- Even trace amounts of a food allergen can cause a reaction. And allergens don’t have to be ingested to cause a reaction; skin contact or inhalation also can trigger it. According to research conducted at Mt. Sinai hospital in New York, people should wait at least four hours after consuming a food allergen before kissing someone who is allergic to that food.
- A FAAN review of food allergy fatalities found that most of the people had never had a severe allergic reaction until the one that caused their death.
- Scientists don’t know why allergies are increasing.
In an effort to help people avoid the health risks posed by food allergens, Congress passed the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004. The law applies to all foods regulated by FDA, both domestic and imported, that were labeled on or after January 1, 2006. (FDA regulates all foods except meat, poultry, and certain egg products.)
Before this law, the labels of foods made from two or more ingredients were required to list all ingredients by their common, or usual, names. The names of some ingredients, however, do not clearly identify their source.
Now, the labels must clearly identify the source of all ingredients that are — or are derived from — the eight most common food allergens. As a result, food labels help allergic consumers to identify offending foods or ingredients so they can more easily avoid them. Read the rest of this entry »
This cantaloupe recall has me a bit unnerved. I like cantaloupe. Last Monday I was at the Farmers Market eyeing a gigantic box of them marked at under a dollar a piece. In my mind that boiled down to a healthy, budget minded, tasty, breakfast, snack, or dessert. There was an older lady next to me commenting on how nice they were, especially for the price. But I had just read something that morning about cantaloupes being recalled. I couldn’t remember the exact details but after hesitating I told her I hoped they weren’t the ones recently found to be contaminated with salmonella. She put back her coveted cantaloupe. I felt bad. What if it’s not that big a deal? What if perfectly good cantaloupes get tossed aside or thrown out unnecessarily? It’s sad we have to wonder about cantaloupes at all.
Food recalls are happening on what seems to be a much too regular basis. If memory serves me we’ve had peanut butter, spinach, beef, pet food, sprouts, milk, more beef, more sprouts, pancake mix, cantaloupe, more cantaloupe and today Milford Valley, Dutch Farms and Kirkwood frozen, prepared chicken (go to: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/News_&_Events/NR_032908_01/index.asp for more details.) Those are just the recent recalls that involve food and are widespread.
It isn’t bad enough that the food gets contaminated, somehow makes it through the system, and causes sickness and in some cases, death. It’s that we have this propagandized, false sense of assurance that some big government agency is actually on top of it. THEY AREN’T! Read the rest of this entry »
You can tell alot about the produce simply by looking at the “product look-up” (PLU) code on the little label. PLUs are used on items that are sold loose or bunched, by weight or by each (i.e. an individual apple or bunch of greens). A PLU code contains 4-5 digits total.
-
Conventionally grown food (not genetically modified, not organic) will have a 4 digit PLU.
-
Organic food will have 5 digits starting with a 9, e.g. an organically grown banana would be 94011.
-
Genetically modified (GM) food will have 5 digits starting with an 8, e.g. a genetically engineered vine ripe tomato would be 84805.
The international PLU system is governed by voluntary cooperation of participating countries that are represented by national or regional representatives on the International Federation for Produce Standards (IFPS) Board of Directors. PLU codes have been used by supermarkets since 1990 to make check-out and inventory control easier, faster, and more accurate.
Who knew? Cracking the egg carton code
March 3, 2008
WHAT DOES THE USDA GRADE SHIELD TELL ME?
About one-third of the nation’s table eggs are packed under USDA’s voluntary grading service. This service provides consumers qualified third-party assurance that the eggs they buy are the grade marked on the carton at the time the eggs are packed and that the plant processing equipment, facilities, sanitation, and operating procedures are continuously monitored by a USDA grader. This assurance is available at little or no additional cost to consumers — eggs graded by USDA (eggs identified with the USDA grade shield) cost essentially the same as eggs without the USDA grade shield.
Only eggs graded by USDA may be packed into cartons that bear the shield-shaped USDA grademark shown here. USDA graders constantly monitor quality, size, and packaging of these eggs.
USDA CARTON STAMPING TELLS WHEN AND WHERE THE EGGS ARE PACKED
When the USDA grade shield is present on the carton, the carton must also be labeled with the date and location of where the eggs were packed. Consumers can also use this information to learn more about the eggs they are buying. This information is typically stamped onto one end of each carton of eggs. An example of a date and location code is shown in the picture below:
Cartons that have the USDA grade shield are marked to identify the company and location where the eggs were packed, and the date that the eggs were washed, graded, and placed into the cartons. In addition, most packers also provide consumers with a code date, which indicates the last date the eggs should be sold at retail, or used by the consumer.
1. CODE DATES:
Egg processors typically print dates commonly called “Code Dates” on cartons for purposes of rotating stock or controlling inventory. “EXP”, “Sell By”, “Best if Used Before” are examples of terminology used for code dating. Use of code dates on USDA graded eggs is optional, however, if they are used, certain rules must be followed.
If an expiration date is used, it must be printed in month/day format and preceded by the appropriate prefix. “EXP”, “Sell By”, “Not to be sold after the date at the end of the carton” are examples of expiration dates. Expiration dates can be no more than 30 days from the day the eggs were packed into the carton. Read the rest of this entry »
Speaking of weird and wonderful…Wildman sends out SOS
February 9, 2008
An Artist’s Statement (Fruit Sticker Artist that is)
by Barry “Wildman” Snyder
Almost World Renowned Food Sticker Mosaic Artist Read the rest of this entry »

