John Edwards: Protecting America’s food

January 5, 2008

I have to admit I’ve been a little caught up in the Iowa caucuses these last few days. Iowa is a huge agricultural state, about 89% of the land area is farms. They rank first in pork production, first in corn production, first in egg production, second in soybean production, and second in red meat production. Bottom line, the people of Iowa know a little bit about food, the land, and the environment. I was anxious to know what they thought about the candidates.

When it was all said and done last night the final four ended up being Obama, Edwards, Clinton, and Hucabee. Who stands out on the issues of food and food safety? Without a doubt, John Edwards.

Fairfield, IA — October 13, 2007 – Senator John Edwards, Governor Bill Richardson, and Senator Chris Dodd have all gone on record in favor of mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods this week in Iowa. In response to questions during their campaign visits to Fairfield this week, each candidate stated he would support legislation to require the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods if elected to be President of the United States.

Checking the websites of all four candidates, Edwards is the only one that includes food and food safety as a key issue. Here’s what he has to say:

“Enough is enough. It’s time to stop the delays and stop giving in to big agribusiness and food importers. We need to give Americans the information they need to choose the best, and safest, food for their families.” – John Edwards

In recent weeks, a series of tainted products from China have exposed gaps in America’s food safety protections. Today, John Edwards outlined his plan to make food safer by taking on the big food companies and food importers on behalf of American consumers and producers. First he would finally implement country-of-origin labeling so families can learn the source of their food and have the option of choosing domestically-raised and grown food. He would also strengthen the Food and Drug Administration’s oversight over the safety of American and imported food.

Neglect of Food Safety: Breakdowns in food safety cause 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations, and 5,000 deaths each year in the U.S. The General Accountability Office recently added our nation’s food safety system to its list of “high-risk” operations. [CDC, 2007; GAO, 2007]

Growing Reliance on Food Imports: Americans eat about 260 pounds of imported foods a year, on average, and the Food and Drug Administration inspects only 0.7 percent of imported food products. Following reports of tainted pet food, contaminated livestock feed and seafood, China recently admitted that 180 food processing facilities had been caught putting industrial additives into a range of food products. An investigation found 23,000 food-safety infractions. Unfortunately, the recent wave of tainted products from China is only the latest in a series of import-related crises over the last decade. Hundreds or more people became sick from Guatemalan raspberries in 1996, Mexican strawberries in 1997, Mexican cantaloupes in 2000, and Mexican green onions in 2003. [AP, 4/16/07; NY Times, 4/30/07; WSJ, 6/30/07; CSPI, 2007]

Agribusinesses Blocking Country-of-Origin Labels and Other Food Safety Steps: Five years ago, Congress passed a law giving consumers the right to know where their meat, produce and nuts came from. However, implementation of the law has been repeatedly delayed by special interests. The USDA is now preparing to allow chickens raised, slaughtered, and cooked in China to be sold here without labels showing their origin. [Center for Food Safety, 2007; Boston Globe, 5/9/07]

Keeping Food Safe

To strengthen America’s food safety, Edwards will make sure that, with country-of-origin labels, consumers can discover the origin of their food. He will overhaul the jumble of agencies overseeing America’s food safety by consolidating responsibility in the FDA and giving it the power to get unsafe food off the shelves. Finally, he will promote the safety of food imported into the U.S. by increasing inspections at ports and by working with other nations to strengthen their own inspection systems.

Providing Consumers with Country-of-Origin Information: Despite increasing concern about the safety of imports from countries like China and interesting buying local produce, implementation of country-of-origin labels has been twice blocked by large meat packers, agribusiness lobbyists and retailers like Wal-Mart. Consumers are not required to be told where these categories of food come from. As president, Edwards will end the delays and start enforcing mandatory country-of- origin labeling, giving Americans the information they need to choose the best food for their families. This will also help domestic farmers and ranchers by giving consumers the option of choosing safe, American-raised meat, and it will motivate foreign producers to make safety a priority and move our food supply system toward fuller accountability for the safety of what we eat. [USDA, 2007; The Hill, 4/7/05; National Family Farm Coalition, 2007]

Integrating Food Safety Rules and Enforcement: Fifteen different agencies are charged with regulating some part of our food supply, enforcing 35 different laws. Different agencies regulate meat lasagna and vegetable lasagna. An open-faced ham-and-cheese sandwich is inspected by the USDA while a closed-face ham-and-cheese sandwich is inspected by the FDA. The USDA and FDA inspect imported food at 18 U.S. ports, sometimes in separate facilities and generally without sharing assets. President Bush’s solution to appoint a “czar” with the bureaucratic rank of assistant commissioner is not nearly enough. Edwards will strengthen the FDA and rebuild our food inspection system within the beefed-up agency, giving one regulatory body clear responsibility for ensuring the security and safety of the food we eat. [National Academy of Sciences, 1998; GAO, 2007; CSPI, 2007; Government Executive, 6/19/07]

Getting Unsafe Food off the Shelves: Unlike the Consumer Products Safety Commission, neither the USDA nor the FDA has the power to order mandatory recalls of the food products they inspect. The agencies are not even equipped to monitor how well companies carry out voluntary recalls. Edwards will establish the power to order mandatory recalls and provide the resources to make sure they are quickly carried out. [GAO, 2007]

Increasing Inspections of Imports: Less than 1 percent of imported food is inspected, down from 8 percent in 1992. Eighty percent of imported food automatically bypasses inspection. Following the recent wave of tainted imports, big corporations are scaling up their inspections of Chinese products, but American families have no choice to rely on an under-resourced and neglected government agency. Edwards will provide the resources for the FDA to do its job. [NY Times, 5/16/07; NY Times, 7/1/07; GAO, 1998]

Requiring Safety Systems Abroad: The U.S. cannot put inspectors in all of the 130 countries that sell us food, but we can insist that these nations take their responsibilities seriously. Edwards will require countries exporting food to the U.S. to have safety systems certified by the FDA as equivalent to our own. This level of protection is now given only to meat, poultry and egg products. This added protection will supplement, not replace, inspections by U.S. officials at ports of entry. [CSM, 5/807; GAO, 2004]

Building on Edwards’ Agenda for Family Farmers: Today’s announcement builds on earlier efforts to create fairness for family farmers and help them create a healthy, abundant and safe food supply:

  • Strictly enforcing laws against anticompetitive mergers and unfair pricing.
  • Passing a national ban on packer ownership to stop the spread of large corporate hog interests.
  • Passing a national moratorium on the construction and expansion of hog farm lagoons.
  • Limiting farm subsidies to $250,000 per person and closing loopholes in payment limits.
  • Expanding conservation programs that help farmers preserve the land.

Those aren’t little sound bites – John Edwards is a man with a plan!

Yes, it is still early in the race and yes we need to look at all the issues. As far as my personal choice, I’m still very undecided. But John Edwards definitely has my attention. And I’m beginning to feel like there’s hope on the horizon.



6 Responses to “John Edwards: Protecting America’s food”

  1. richard the poet Says:

    but what about pet food
    i am for him or clinton

  2. yamada Says:

    I do vegetables cultivation in Japan.
    I am glad to find this site.

  3. […] "Passing a national moratorium on the construction and expansion of hog farm lagoons.") (Food Democracy) Related: Kerry reveals who’s been advising […]

  4. annierichardson Says:


    Thanks for stopping by, all the way from Japan. Hope to hear from you again soon.

  5. kurenai Says:

    Thank you for good article

  6. […] dug, we’ve written, we’ve called, and except for ex-candidate, John Edwards (see John Edwards: Protecting America’s Food), we’ve been hard pressed to find any substantive policy position(s) about our food put forth […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: