Chicken are not ‘livestock’ – humane slaughter not applicable

March 10, 2008

According to a US judge, chickens are not “livestock” and are therefore not subject to the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act.

A lawsuit brought by the Humane Society of the US (HSUS) against the Agriculture Department has argued that the USDA had misinterpreted the 50-year-old Act, reports Cattle Network.

“The court finds the legislative history strongly demonstrates unambiguous congressional intent that livestock, as used in the HMSA, does not include poultry,” US District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel reportedly wrote in her opinion.

Judge Patel granted summary judgment in USDA’s favour and dismissed the lawsuit.

HSUS’s argument was based on a 1958 dictionary definition of livestock that said that the word encompassed “useful” animals on a farm, while USDA said that the term has always internally meant to exclude poultry.

“The plain language of these bills indicates that Congress intended to exclude poultry from the definition of livestock when it enacted H.R. 8308, the bill that eventually became the HMSA,” Patel wrote.


See also:

One Response to “Chicken are not ‘livestock’ – humane slaughter not applicable”

  1. mindy Says:

    This is such crap! Chickens account for most of the animals slaughtered in the United States. They are intelligent creatures who live horrible, short lives, and then aren’t even protected under the law. Makes me so angry.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: